On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 5:55 PM, Andrew Dunstan <and...@dunslane.net> wrote: > On 02/16/2011 04:24 PM, Robert Haas wrote: >> >> On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 1:02 PM, Stephen Frost<sfr...@snowman.net> wrote: >>> >>> * Andrew Dunstan (and...@dunslane.net) wrote: >>>> >>>> On 02/15/2011 11:13 AM, Stephen Frost wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Think I suggested that at one point. I'm all for doing that on a major >>>>> version change like this one, but I think we already had some concerns >>>>> about that on this thread (Andrew maybe?). >>>> >>>> I could live with it for a release if I thought we had a clear path >>>> ahead, but I think there are some design issues that we need to >>>> think about before we start providing for header lines and variable >>>> formats in CSV logs, particularly w.r.t. log rotation etc. So I'm >>>> slightly nervous about going ahead with this right now. >>> >>> I believe the suggestion that Robert and I were talking about above was >>> to just unilatterally change the CSV log file output format to include >>> current_role. No header lines, no variable output format, etc. >>> >>> I do think we can make header lines and variable output work, if we can >>> get agreement on what the semantics should be. >> >> I think we're back to not having a consensus on a reasonable way to >> proceed here. Let's take this up again for 9.2. >> > > That's up to you. I can certainly live with what is suggested in Stephen's > penultimate para above.
OK. If no one objects further, Stephen and I will make that happen. Otherwise: he's dead, Jim. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
