On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 1:04 PM, Thom Brown <t...@linux.com> wrote: > On 7 March 2011 23:21, David Fetter <da...@fetter.org> wrote: >> On Mon, Mar 07, 2011 at 10:53:17PM +0530, Thom Brown wrote: >>> On 7 March 2011 22:31, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> > On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 6:16 AM, Thom Brown <t...@linux.com> wrote: >>> >> On 7 March 2011 15:27, Thom Brown <t...@linux.com> wrote: >>> >>> I've attached a small patch with a bit of clarification and a typo fix >>> >>> in the synchronous_standby_names parameter info. >>> >> >>> >> Okay, I've noticed that the main documentation also needed some fixes, >>> >> so those have been included in this new patch. >>> > >>> > I don't think it's necessary to cross-post these emails.... >>> >>> I've received conflicting information in the past on this, but I'm >>> assuming you're suggesting to send this just to the -docs list in >>> future? >> >> As I'm putting together the patches section for the PostgreSQL Weekly >> News, it helps me *enormously* to have only one list I need to check, >> so at least for me, it's an enormous help to have all patches at least >> CC'd, or better still, only posted, to -hackers. > > I cross-posted as it's a docs change, but I want to invite the > critical eye of those who dev'd it. Okay, so doc patches should go > exclusively to the -hackers list? Last time I recall some disparity > surrounding what I should be doing.
I'm not sure we have any unanimity on what the "right" thing to do here is, and I guess I don't *really* care, except that I mildly dislike cross-posting as a general principle. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers