Excerpts from Tom Lane's message of lun mar 07 15:16:31 -0300 2011: > If we do that then it becomes worth wondering what the -docs list is for > at all. Maybe we *should* get rid of it; I dunno. I see your point > about how the factual issues involved in a docs change ought to be > vetted on -hackers, but on the other hand the traffic on -hackers is so > high already that I'm not happy about folding another list with a > reasonably distinct charter into it.
Searching for doc changes/suggestions is helped tremendously by having them in a separate list. -1 for merging it with -hackers. I have no opinion on the -hackers crossposting issue as it doesn't affect me at all. -- Álvaro Herrera <alvhe...@commandprompt.com> The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
