On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 11:43 PM, Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> wrote: > Thom Brown wrote: >> On 7 March 2011 22:31, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 6:16 AM, Thom Brown <t...@linux.com> wrote: >> >> On 7 March 2011 15:27, Thom Brown <t...@linux.com> wrote: >> >>> I've attached a small patch with a bit of clarification and a typo fix >> >>> in the synchronous_standby_names parameter info. >> >> >> >> Okay, I've noticed that the main documentation also needed some fixes, >> >> so those have been included in this new patch. >> > >> > I don't think it's necessary to cross-post these emails.... >> >> I've received conflicting information in the past on this, but I'm >> assuming you're suggesting to send this just to the -docs list in >> future? > > I send pure woring changes only to the docs list, and items that are > related to behavior and docs to both. Does that help?
Well, there's basically no point in posting patches you've already committed. We have a list where those get posted, and it's -committers. If you're referring to patches you haven't committed yet, then the effect of sending them to both -docs and -hackers is presumably to encourage even fewer people to read and respond to traffic on -docs than already do. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
