On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 2:55 PM, Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@commandprompt.com> wrote: > Excerpts from Robert Haas's message of vie mar 18 14:25:16 -0300 2011: >> On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 1:15 PM, Simon Riggs <si...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > >> > SyncRepUpdateSyncStandbysDefined() is added into walwriter, which means >> > waiters won't be released if we do a sighup during a fast shutdown, >> > since the walwriter gets killed as soon as that starts. I'm thinking >> > bgwriter should handle that now. >> >> Hmm. I was thinking that doing it in WAL writer would make it more >> responsive, but since this is a fairly unlikely scenario, it's >> probably not worth complicating the shutdown sequence to do it the way >> I did. I'll move it to bgwriter. > > Can't they both do it?
Yeah, but it seems fairly pointless. In retrospect, I probably should have done it the way Simon is proposing to begin with. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
