On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 6:13 AM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Committed with some additional hacking. In particular, I believe that >> your version made SYNCHRONOUS_COMMIT_LOCAL equivalent to >> SYNCHRONOUS_COMMIT_OFF, which was wrong; and your replacement of >> synchronous_replication by synchronous_commit in the docs was a bit >> too formulaic; in particular, the section on setting up a basic sync >> rep configuration said that all you needed to do was set >> synchronous_commit=on, which clearly made no sense, since that was >> neither necessary (since that's the default) nor sufficient (since you >> have to set synchronous_standby_names). > > Err, woops. Actually, I'm wrong about the first point: your coding > worked, but I had to adjust it when I reordered the enum. I think the > new ordering is more logical
Yes. Thanks a lot! Regards, -- Fujii Masao NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION NTT Open Source Software Center -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
