On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 4:53 PM, Dimitri Fontaine <dimi...@2ndquadrant.fr> wrote: > Hi, > > Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes: >>> The attached patch merges synchronous_replication into synchronous_commit. >> Committed > > Without discussion? I would think that this patch is stepping on the > other one toes and that maybe would need to make a decision about sync > rep behavior before to commit this change.
Hmm.. I think that we reached the consensus about merging two GUCs in previous discussion. You argue that synchronization level should be controlled in separate two parameters? Regards, -- Fujii Masao NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION NTT Open Source Software Center -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
