On 05.04.2011 11:31, Dimitri Fontaine wrote:
Fujii Masao<masao.fu...@gmail.com> writes:
Hmm.. I think that we reached the consensus about merging two GUCs
in previous discussion. You argue that synchronization level should be
controlled in separate two parameters?
No, sorry about confusion. One GUC is better. What I'm wondering is
why commit it *now*, because I think we didn't yet decide on what the
supported behaviors supported in 9.1 should be.
What do you mean by "supported behaviors"?
--
Heikki Linnakangas
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
