On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 10:20:21AM -0400, Robert Haas wrote: > I tweaked the comments accordingly, and also reverted your change to > the error message, because I don't want to introduce new terminology > here that we're not using anywhere else.
FWIW, the term "stand-alone composite type" appears twice in our documentation. > I also thought about making this use parserOpenTable() rather than > relation_open(), but it turns out that's not so easy, because the > typed table name is getting shoved into a TypeName rather than a > RangeVar. I don't think that's the choice I would have made but I'm > not sure how excited it's worth getting about it. I hadn't thought about this angle. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
