On Wed, 2011-04-20 at 10:44 -0400, Noah Misch wrote: > If we add that ownership check, we'll protect some operations on the > type. The > cost is localized divergence from our principle that types have no > usage > restrictions. I'm of the opinion that it's not worth introducing that > policy > exception to block just some of these avenues of attack. I would not > object to > it, though.
So that means we should leave it as is for now? Fine with me. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list ([email protected]) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
