Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes:
> On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 11:33 AM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> What about inverting the message phrasing, ie
>>
>> ERROR: type stuff must not be a table's row type
> It also can't be a view's row type, a sequence's row type, a foreign
> table's row type...
Well, you could say "relation's row type" if you wanted to be formally
correct, but I'm not convinced that's an improvement.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
