On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 21:54, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Peter Eisentraut <pete...@gmx.net> writes: >> I would imagine one commit fest per month, but >> it's only a week long. > > BTW, just as a thought experiment: what about a one-day CF once a week? > "Patch Tuesdays", if you will. Spend all day reviewing/committing, > bounce back whatever is not ready, patch authors try again next week.
I think that would pretty much kill the process for any committer who is not employed to work full-time on postgresql *development*. Those who have other dayjobs (which may well be postgresql consulting or training or whatever) will probably end up dealing with significantly fewer patches, leaving even more of the burden on those who do have the dedicated schedule. I know I don't do as much reviewing/comitting as I'd like to do during the commitfests, but with a process like that, it would probably become more or less zero. -- Magnus Hagander Me: http://www.hagander.net/ Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/ -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers