On Wed, 2011-04-20 at 16:25 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > But ignoring scheduling difficulties, my point here is that > it seems like the shorter the cycle, the better, for a lot of > purposes. Can we do any better than once-a-month, or is that the > limit given that people need flexible schedules within the fest?
If you want to keep the basic idea of predictable periods of activity and rest, I think that's as far as you can go. I'm personally not terribly tied to that; I'm more interested in the tool support that the CF gives us. I might also like, for example, just a permanent patch queue with patches sorted by date. Multiple approaches like that could also very well exist in parallel, even within the existing commitfest application framework. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
