On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 1:53 PM, Josh Berkus <j...@agliodbs.com> wrote: > While the first was specific to the Aster submissions, I've seen the > second problem with lots of first-time submissions to this list. Our > feedback to submitters of big patches requires a lot of comprehension of > project personalities and politics to make any sense of.
Ah ha! Now we're getting somewhere. As was doubtless obvious from my previous responses, I don't agree that the process is as broken as I felt you were suggesting, and I think we've made a lot of improvements. However, I am in complete agreement with you on this point. Unfortunately, people often come into our community with incorrect assumptions about how it works, including: - someone's in charge - there's one right answer - it's our job to fix your problem Now if you read a few hundred emails (which is not that much calendar time, if you read them all) it's not too hard to figure out what the real dynamic is, and I think that real dynamic is increasingly positive (with some unfortunate exceptions). But if the first thing you do is post (no doubt about some large or controversial change), yeah, serious culture shock. >>> That goes double for some of the people complaining in this thread about >>> dissatisfaction with the current process. > > The problem is not the process itself, but that there is little > documentation of that process, and that much of that documentation does > not match the defacto process. Obviously, the onus is on me as much as > anyone else to fix this. I can't disagree with this, either. I'm not sure where it would be possible for us to document this that people would actually see and read, and I think it's a tough to understand just from reading a wiki page or a blog post: if you've never been part of a community that operates this way, then it's kind of strange and it takes a while to adjust. Of course from the inside it seems to make a fair amount of sense, but what good is that? Anyhow, whatever we can do to help people get into the swing of things I'm highly in favor of. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
