Excerpts from Kevin Grittner's message of mar may 31 12:41:59 -0400 2011:
> Joe Abbate <j...@freedomcircle.com> wrote:
>  
> > I assume a link such as
> > 
> > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-bugs/2003-12/msg00046.php
> > 
> > would be easier to follow than
> > 
> > <20031205173035.ga16...@wolff.to>
>  
> The point is that the community seems to have reached a consensus
> that they would rather use this URL for the above message:
>  
> http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/20031205173035.ga16...@wolff.to

Yeah, I keep dreaming that one day we will get rid of the silly monthly
partitioning of archives.  Those URLs will eventually be legacy --
existing ones will continue to work, but new messages will not (may not)
get them any longer.

-- 
Álvaro Herrera <alvhe...@commandprompt.com>
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to