2011/6/6 Jeff Davis <pg...@j-davis.com>: > On Mon, 2011-06-06 at 06:56 +0200, Pavel Stehule wrote: >> 2011/6/6 Darren Duncan <dar...@darrenduncan.net>: >> > Jeff Davis wrote: >> >> >> >> I'd like to take another look at Range Types and whether part of it >> >> should be an extension. Some of these issues relate to extensions in >> >> general, not just range types. >> >> >> >> First of all, what are the advantages to being in core? >> >> it should be supported by FOREACH statement in PL/pgSQL > > Oh, good idea. It would only work for discrete ranges though. > > However, I would need to somehow reintroduce the concept of "next", > which has some hazards to it (as Tom pointed out, we don't want someone > to define the "next" for a float to be "+1.0"). I'll have to think about > this.
we can define a step FOREACH x IN RANGE ..... BY .... LOOP END LOOP Regards Pavel > > Regards, > Jeff Davis > > -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
