Jeff Davis <pg...@j-davis.com> writes:
> On Mon, 2011-06-06 at 14:42 -0700, Darren Duncan wrote:
>> Can Pg be changed to support "." in operator names as long as they don't 
>> just 
>> appear by themselves?  What would this break to do so?

> Someone else would have to comment on that.

DOT_DOT is already a token in plpgsql; trying to make it be also an
operator name would break a lot of existing plpgsql code.

                        regards, tom lane

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to