Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes:
> On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 10:15 AM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> If we need to work around brain-dead isupper() tests, maybe the best
>> thing is to implement two versions of the loop:
>>
>> if (encoding is single byte)
>> ... loop as it stands ...
>> else
>> ... loop without the "else if" part
> That seems like a clear improvement. It's a long way from perfect,
> but still worthwhile.
> Would we back-patch that? Just do it in master? Wait for 9.2?
It looks to me like a portability bug fix, so I'd say back-patch.
I'll take care of it, unless you're hot to do so?
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
