On 06/28/2011 03:48 PM, Dave Page wrote:

But if you want to run some more frequently you'd still be stuck having to 
manage that yourself. There's actually not a lot of point in doing it that way, 
though. We don't build unless there have been changes on the branch, unless 
told otherwise, so you might as well run frequently and test all the branches - 
for the most part only HEAD (i.e. master) will be built because it gets far 
more changes than the back branches.
It was something Tom asked for ages ago, so he could see if the
Windows build got broken more promptly. I didn't want multiple
branches running with increased frequency as I run a number of animals
on a single machine with vmware, and a back patched change could cause
a lot of extra work.


Oh, so maybe we need to have some sort of throttle. Probably just for non-head or non-(head-or-latest) would suffice.

cheers

andrew



--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to