Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes:
> On Jul 15, 2011, at 12:06 PM, "Kevin Grittner" <kevin.gritt...@wicourts.gov>
> wrote:
>> I have a suspicion that we might sometimes find the information
>> conveyed by the detail useful when responding to users with
>> questions; but the language as it stands seems confusing for users.
> I think removing info here or making it harder to get would be a mistake.
Agreed. If we can clarify the messages, and/or make sure the
terminology they use is documented, that'd be a good thing; but let's
not just remove them.
I think that Peter's real concern is whether these are worth
translating, and I share that doubt. Perhaps we should invent an
errdetail_internal, parallel to errmsg_internal, that works like
errdetail but doesn't treat the message as a candidate for translation?
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
