Excerpts from Peter Eisentraut's message of mié jul 27 16:19:22 -0400 2011: > On lör, 2011-07-16 at 15:01 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > > Well, as I mentioned in the commit message, I've thought for some time > > that there were use cases for errdetail_internal. Whether these > > particular places in predicate.c use it or not doesn't affect that. > > Looking at commit 1af37ec96d97722aeb527f5f43d6f6f2304f0861, not all of > these are strings that don't need to be translated. For example, you > can't assume that the translation of "%s: %s" is "%s: %s" or that the > translation of "%s (%x)" is "%s (%x)". I'll review those in detail when > I find some time, but some of them will probably have to be reverted.
Hmm, if "%s: %s" has different uses in different places, we're going to need a more involved solution because they might not translate identically. In any case, we need /* translator: */ comments to explain what's going on. -- Álvaro Herrera <alvhe...@commandprompt.com> The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
