Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@commandprompt.com> wrote: > Excerpts from Tom Lane's message: > >> I think that Peter's real concern is whether these are worth >> translating, and I share that doubt. Perhaps we should invent an >> errdetail_internal, parallel to errmsg_internal, that works like >> errdetail but doesn't treat the message as a candidate for >> translation? > > Yeah. The other point is that translated versions of those > phrases are likely to introduce randomly diverging terms, which is > not going to help with debugging. As long as the technology is > new enough that a user is going to need help from -hackers (or at > least someone who read and grokked README.SSI) to debug a problem, > there's no benefit to translating those errdetails. OK, since that seems to be the consensus, I put a patch together. Testing it now. Will post once I've confirmed it doesn't break anything. -Kevin
-- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
