Tom, > No, I don't. You're adding complication to solve a problem that doesn't > need to be solved. The standard says to return the name of the > constraint for a constraint-violation failure. It does not say anything > about naming the associated column(s). COLUMN_NAME is only supposed to > be defined for certain kinds of errors, and this isn't one of them.
Are we talking about FK constraints here, or CHECK contstraints? -- Josh Berkus PostgreSQL Experts Inc. http://pgexperts.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
