On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 10:51 AM, Joshua D. Drake <j...@commandprompt.com> wrote: > On 07/21/2011 11:13 AM, Tom Lane wrote: >> >> "Joshua D. Drake"<j...@commandprompt.com> writes: >>> >>> So I am looking intently on what it is going to take to get the URI >>> patch done for psql [1] and was digging around the web and have a URI >>> parser library. It is under the New BSD license and is strictly RFC RFC >>> 3986 [2] compliant . >> >> Surely we do not need a whole library to parse URIs. > > Any other comments? I don't want to do a bunch of work just to have it > tossesd on a technicality.
Well, you haven't explained what feature you are trying to develop, so it's a bit premature to speculate on whether that feature is valuable enough to justify the carrying cost of another library. Like Tom, I'm not real sure why we would need a library for this. It seems like a hundred lines of C would be sufficient for most things you'd likely want to do, and less work than integrating someone else's code. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
