On 07/22/2011 08:36 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 10:51 AM, Joshua D. Drake<j...@commandprompt.com>
wrote:
On 07/21/2011 11:13 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
"Joshua D. Drake"<j...@commandprompt.com> writes:
So I am looking intently on what it is going to take to get the URI
patch done for psql [1] and was digging around the web and have a URI
parser library. It is under the New BSD license and is strictly RFC RFC
3986 [2] compliant .
Surely we do not need a whole library to parse URIs.
Any other comments? I don't want to do a bunch of work just to have it
tossesd on a technicality.
Well, you haven't explained what feature you are trying to develop, so
it's a bit premature to speculate on whether that feature is valuable
enough to justify the carrying cost of another library.
Yes I did:
OP of this thread:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2011-07/msg01144.php
It is letting pgsql use URI syntax.
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
--
Command Prompt, Inc. - http://www.commandprompt.com/
PostgreSQL Support, Training, Professional Services and Development
The PostgreSQL Conference - http://www.postgresqlconference.org/
@cmdpromptinc - @postgresconf - 509-416-6579
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
