On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 2:09 PM, Joshua D. Drake <j...@commandprompt.com> wrote: > I am not neccessarily looking to include it in our tarball. What I asked > was: > > Assuming the code actually makes this patch easier, do we: > > A. Pull in the code into the main tree > B. Instead have it as a requirement via configure?
Well, both ways are going to cause a certain number of problems. Pulling it into the tree means we've got to maintain it forever; requiring it via configure means that everyone who packages PostgreSQL now has to include that library if they want to include PostgreSQL. > I am not arguing one way or the other. I am trying to find the best > solution. I personally think you are handwaving if you think we can build > out a robust parser in a couple of hours. I respect your opinion, but, in this case, I disagree. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
