On 19.09.2011 15:50, Josh Berkus wrote:
+1 for a closed mailing list. It's a bit annoying to have to do such
a thing, but it's not like we haven't got other closed lists for
appropriate purposes. I guess the real question is, exactly what will
be the requirements for joining?
Well, one requirement would be agreeing not to share anything discussed
in public without a vote of the entire group. Annoying, but that's how
confidential drafts go.
Exactly.
Honestly, I don't expect that it will get a big group.
It is very dry stuff.
FWIW, the fact that the drafts *are* confidential is symptomatic of
everything which is wrong with the ISO.
+1 - But all suggestions to change it got rejected.
Also, Suzanne indicated that summaries of what features were being
discussed could be posted in public, even if details could not be.
I looked into it - I fear it will get too gibberish.
You sometimes just need the details.
Also - just forwarding it - is much easier and less time intensive for me.
Susanne
--
Susanne Ebrecht - 2ndQuadrant
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training and Services
www.2ndQuadrant.com
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
