On tis, 2011-09-20 at 11:12 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > > > +1 for a closed mailing list. It's a bit annoying to have to do > such > > > a thing, but it's not like we haven't got other closed lists for > > > appropriate purposes. > > > > Well, that much we've already decided a few years ago. The blocking > > issues are: (1) do we have enough interest, and (2) where to put it > (I'm > > looking at you, pgfoundry). > > I don't see why we wouldn't put it in @postgresql.org.
One nice thing about pgfoundry would be the document manager. Also, at least at some point in the past, a pgfoundry project was easier to manage than getting anything done about a @postgresql.org mailing list. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
