On sön, 2011-09-18 at 12:43 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Peter Eisentraut <pete...@gmx.net> writes: > > On sön, 2011-09-18 at 09:45 -0500, Dave Page wrote: > >> That is much more reasonable, though unfortunately not what was said. > >> Regardless, I stand by my main point that such a representative should > >> be communicating with the project regularly. Having a rep who works > >> outside the project is of no use at all. > > > Well, the point of this thread is, how can she communicate? > > +1 for a closed mailing list. It's a bit annoying to have to do such > a thing, but it's not like we haven't got other closed lists for > appropriate purposes.
Well, that much we've already decided a few years ago. The blocking issues are: (1) do we have enough interest, and (2) where to put it (I'm looking at you, pgfoundry). > I guess the real question is, exactly what will be the requirements > for joining? As as far as I'm concerned, anyone who is known in the community and has a plausible interest can join. The requirement is that we share this material with "colleagues" for consultation, as opposed to posting it on the public internet. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers