Royce Ausburn <royce...@inomial.com> writes: > Initial Review for patch: > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2011-09/msg00744.php > The patch adds a means of specifying named cursor parameter arguments in > pg/plsql.
> Do we want that? > I very rarely use pg/plsql, so I won't speak to its utility. However there > has been some discussion about the idea: > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2010-09/msg01440.php I still think what I said in that message, which is that it's premature to add this syntax to plpgsql cursors when we have thoughts of changing it. There is not any groundswell of demand from the field for named parameters to cursors, so I think we can just leave this in abeyance until the function case has settled. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
