"David E. Wheeler" <da...@kineticode.com> writes: > On Oct 6, 2011, at 9:46 AM, Tom Lane wrote: >>> +1. However, if that's the route we're traveling down, I think we had >>> better go ahead and remove the one remaining => operator from hstore >>> in 9.2:
>> Fair enough. > Would it then be added as an alias for := for named function parameters? Or > would that come still later? Once we do that, it will be impossible not merely deprecated to use => as an operator name. I think that has to wait at least another release cycle or two past where we're using it ourselves. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers