Forgive my ignorance -- do I need to be doing anything else now seeing as I 
started the review?  


On 07/10/2011, at 7:15 AM, Pavel Stehule wrote:

> 2011/10/6 Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com>:
>> On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 1:46 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>>> "David E. Wheeler" <da...@kineticode.com> writes:
>>>>>> Would it then be added as an alias for := for named function parameters? 
>>>>>> Or would that come still later?
>>> 
>>>>> Once we do that, it will be impossible not merely deprecated to use =>
>>>>> as an operator name.  I think that has to wait at least another release
>>>>> cycle or two past where we're using it ourselves.
>>> 
>>>> Okay. I kind of like := so there's no rush AFAIC. :-)
>>> 
>>> Hmm ... actually, that raises another issue that I'm not sure whether
>>> there's consensus for or not.  Are we intending to keep name := value
>>> syntax forever, as an alternative to the standard name => value syntax?
>>> I can't immediately see a reason not to, other than the "it's not
>>> standard" argument.
>>> 
>>> Because if we *are* going to keep it forever, there's no very good
>>> reason why we shouldn't accept this plpgsql cursor patch now.  We'd
>>> just have to remember to extend plpgsql to take => at the same time
>>> we do that for core function calls.
>> 
>> It's hard to see adding support for => and dropping support for := in
>> the same release.  That would be a compatibility nightmare.
>> 
>> If := is used by the standard for some other, incompatible purpose,
>> then I suppose we would want to add support for =>, wait a few
>> releases, deprecate :=, wait a couple of releases, remove :=
>> altogether.  But IIRC we picked := precisely because the standard
>> didn't use it at all, or at least not for anything related... in which
>> case we may as well keep it around more or less indefinitely.
> 
> +1
> 
> Pavel
> 
>> 
>> --
>> Robert Haas
>> EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
>> The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
>> 
>> --
>> Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
>> To make changes to your subscription:
>> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
>> 
> 
> -- 
> Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to