Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes: > But on the flip side, I think we're generally a bit more flexible > about exposing things via C than through the procedural languages.
So we could still expose the parsetree of the current command. I wonder if it's already possible to get that from a C coded trigger, but I'll admit I'm yet to code a trigger in C. Will look into that. Then as Andres proposed, a new function would be available to get the value, we're not changing the trigger procedure function API in case the language is C… Regards, -- Dimitri Fontaine http://2ndQuadrant.fr PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
