On Wednesday, January 18, 2012 08:17:36 PM Alvaro Herrera wrote: > Excerpts from Dimitri Fontaine's message of miƩ ene 18 16:03:29 -0300 2012: > > At the moment the trigger functions are called from > > standard_ProcessUtility() and are given the parse tree as handed over to > > that function, before the parse analysis. > > > > We can easily enough copy the parse tree and do another round of parse > > analysis on it only when some command triggers are going to get called. > > Is the cost of doing so acceptable? > > Huh, isn't it simpler to just pass the triggers the parse tree *after* > parse analysis? I don't understand what you're doing here. Parse analysis is not exactly nicely separated for utility statements.
Andres -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers