(2012/02/25 7:31), Peter Eisentraut wrote: > Could we name this "postgresql_fdw" instead? We already have several > ${productname}_fdw out there, and I don't want to get in the business of > having to guess variant spellings.
I worry name conflict with existing postgresql_fdw_validator, which is implemented in backend binary and used by contrib/dblink. I thought that we should use another name for PostgreSQL FDW unless we can change specification of dblink connection string. -- Shigeru Hanada -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers