Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes:
> On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 5:31 PM, Peter Eisentraut <pete...@gmx.net> wrote:
>> Could we name this "postgresql_fdw" instead? We already have several
>> ${productname}_fdw out there, and I don't want to get in the business of
>> having to guess variant spellings.
> If you don't like variant spellings, having anything to do with
> PostgreSQL, aka Postgres, and usually discussed on the pgsql-* mailing
> lists, is probably a bad idea.
[ snicker ] But still, Peter has a point: pgsql is not a name for the
product, it's at best an abbreviation. We aren't calling the other
thing orcl_fdw or ora_fdw.
I think either postgres_fdw or postgresql_fdw would be fine.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
