Fujii Masao <masao.fu...@gmail.com> writes: > Euler proposed one more patch upthread, which replaces pg_size_pretty(bigint) > with pg_size_pretty(numeric) so that pg_size_pretty(pg_xlog_location_diff()) > succeeds. It's also worth committing this patch?
Why would it be useful to use pg_size_pretty on xlog locations? -1 because of the large expense of bigint->numeric->whatever conversion that would be added to existing uses. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers