On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 9:55 AM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> I wrote:
>> Fujii Masao <masao.fu...@gmail.com> writes:
>>> Euler proposed one more patch upthread, which replaces
>>> pg_size_pretty(bigint)
>>> with pg_size_pretty(numeric) so that pg_size_pretty(pg_xlog_location_diff())
>>> succeeds. It's also worth committing this patch?
>
>> Why would it be useful to use pg_size_pretty on xlog locations?
>> -1 because of the large expense of bigint->numeric->whatever conversion
>> that would be added to existing uses.
>
> Actually ... now that I look at it, isn't it completely bogus to be
> using numeric for the result of pg_xlog_location_diff? There's no way
> for the difference of two xlog locations to be anywhere near as wide as
> 64 bits. That'd only be possible if XLogFileSize exceeded 1GB, which we
> don't let it get anywhere near.
rhaas=# select pg_xlog_location_diff('ffffffff/0', '0/0');
pg_xlog_location_diff
-----------------------
18374686475393433600
(1 row)
rhaas=# select pg_xlog_location_diff('ffffffff/0', '0/0')::int8;
ERROR: bigint out of range
STATEMENT: select pg_xlog_location_diff('ffffffff/0', '0/0')::int8;
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
