Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes:
> On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 9:37 AM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> Why would it be useful to use pg_size_pretty on xlog locations?
> The point is that it would be useful to use it on the difference
> between two xlog locations,
Um, that is exactly the claim I was questioning. Why is that useful?
> but that is a numeric value, not int8, because of signedness issues.
See my followup --- this statement appears factually incorrect,
whatever you may feel about the usefulness issue.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
