Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes: > On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 9:37 AM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> Why would it be useful to use pg_size_pretty on xlog locations?
> The point is that it would be useful to use it on the difference > between two xlog locations, Um, that is exactly the claim I was questioning. Why is that useful? > but that is a numeric value, not int8, because of signedness issues. See my followup --- this statement appears factually incorrect, whatever you may feel about the usefulness issue. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers