On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 15:37, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Fujii Masao <masao.fu...@gmail.com> writes: >> Euler proposed one more patch upthread, which replaces pg_size_pretty(bigint) >> with pg_size_pretty(numeric) so that pg_size_pretty(pg_xlog_location_diff()) >> succeeds. It's also worth committing this patch? > > Why would it be useful to use pg_size_pretty on xlog locations? > -1 because of the large expense of bigint->numeric->whatever conversion > that would be added to existing uses.
Given the expense, perhaps we need to different (overloaded) functions instead? -- Magnus Hagander Me: http://www.hagander.net/ Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/ -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
