On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 5:30 AM, Robert Haas <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 10:34 PM, Fujii Masao <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> I can see a usecase for having a pg_size_pretty(numeric) as an option. >>>> Not necessarily a very big one, but a >0 one. >>> >>> +1. >> >> +1, too. > > I did some beautification of this patch. I think the attached version > is cleaner and easier to read. Thoughts?
Looks good to me. Thanks for polishing the patch! Regards, -- Fujii Masao -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list ([email protected]) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
