On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 7:25 AM, Fujii Masao <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 5:30 AM, Robert Haas <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 10:34 PM, Fujii Masao <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> I can see a usecase for having a pg_size_pretty(numeric) as an option. >>>>> Not necessarily a very big one, but a >0 one. >>>> >>>> +1. >>> >>> +1, too. >> >> I did some beautification of this patch. I think the attached version >> is cleaner and easier to read. Thoughts? > > Looks good to me. Thanks for polishing the patch!
You're welcome. Committed. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list ([email protected]) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
