Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes: > Examining this thread, I think there is insufficient consensus to push > this patch into 9.2. It's not entirely clear that this patch isn't > what we want, but it's not entirely clear that it is what we want > either, and I think it's too late in the release cycle to push > anything into the release that we're not fairly sure we actually want, > because there won't be time to revisit that decision before this ends > up out in the wild. It's also not the sort of thing we can just whack > around in the next release if we get it wrong, because APIs for coping > with versioning are exactly the kind of thing that you can't go change > at the drop of a hat. I'm therefore marking this Returned with > Feedback.
Fair enough I guess. The first extension patch took me more than 2 yearsâ«of brewing before we get to a consensus on what we wanted in core, I shouldn't have assumed it would ease the path for next improvements too much. Regards, -- Dimitri Fontaine http://2ndQuadrant.fr PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers