On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 2:37 PM, Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@commandprompt.com> wrote: > The FK locking patch isn't on this list; however, I'm hijacking this > thread to say that some benchmarking runs we tried weren't all that > great, showing 9% performance degradation on stock pgbench -- i.e. a > large hit that will harm everybody even if they are not using FKs at > all. I'm thus setting the patch returned with feedback, which is sure > to make several hackers happy and tons of users unhappy.
Ouch! That's a real bummer. It makes me glad that you tested it, but I can't say I'm happy about the outcome. Did you get in any insight into where the regression is coming from? -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
