On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 7:37 PM, Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@commandprompt.com> wrote:
> The FK locking patch isn't on this list; We'd agreed you were the assigned committer, hence not on list. > however, I'm hijacking this > thread to say that some benchmarking runs we tried weren't all that > great, showing 9% performance degradation on stock pgbench -- i.e. a > large hit that will harm everybody even if they are not using FKs at > all. I'm thus setting the patch returned with feedback, which is sure > to make several hackers happy and tons of users unhappy. I've done what I can to alter that, but I think its the right decision at this point. I would say its been the largest and most subtle patch submitted, so please don't be down by that. -- Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
