Excerpts from Robert Haas's message of jue abr 05 15:40:17 -0300 2012: > > On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 2:37 PM, Alvaro Herrera > <alvhe...@commandprompt.com> wrote: > > The FK locking patch isn't on this list; however, I'm hijacking this > > thread to say that some benchmarking runs we tried weren't all that > > great, showing 9% performance degradation on stock pgbench -- i.e. a > > large hit that will harm everybody even if they are not using FKs at > > all. I'm thus setting the patch returned with feedback, which is sure > > to make several hackers happy and tons of users unhappy. > > Ouch! That's a real bummer. It makes me glad that you tested it, but > I can't say I'm happy about the outcome. Did you get in any insight > into where the regression is coming from?
Not really -- after reaching that conclusion I dropped immediate work on the patch to do other stuff (like checking whether there's any other patch I can help with in commitfest). I will resume work later, for a (hopefully early) 9.3 submission. -- Álvaro Herrera <alvhe...@commandprompt.com> The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
