On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 5:32 PM, Magnus Hagander <mag...@hagander.net> wrote: > It contains a number of unrelated changes of %m -> %s - what's the > motivation for those?
%m in fprintf() is glibc extension according to man page, so it's not portable and should not be used, I think. We discussed this before and reached consensus not to use %m :) http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2011-01/msg01674.php > You also removed the "safeguard" of always sleeping at least 1 second > - should we keep some level of safeguard there, even if it's not in > full seconds anymore? > > Is the -1 sent into localTimestampDifference still relevent at all? No because that "safeguard" would mess up with a user who sets replication_timeout to less than one second. Though I'm not sure whether there is really any user who wants such too short timeout.... Regards, -- Fujii Masao -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
