On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 11:42 PM, Magnus Hagander <mag...@hagander.net> wrote: > Works for me. We still need a (reworked) patch, though, right? We just > move where the move between seconds and milliseconds happens?
Attached is the updated version of the patch. > I definitely don't think we need subsecond granularity in the user > facing number. Even a second is pretty short. Yep. > (We do need to retain the ability to set it to 0 = off of course). Yep, a value of zero disables the status updates, and the patch adds that explanation into the document of pg_basebackup and pg_receivexlog. Regards, -- Fujii Masao
timeout_handling_v4.patch
Description: Binary data
-- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
