On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 8:10 PM, Fujii Masao <masao.fu...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 11:42 PM, Magnus Hagander <mag...@hagander.net> wrote: >> Works for me. We still need a (reworked) patch, though, right? We just >> move where the move between seconds and milliseconds happens? > > Attached is the updated version of the patch.
Thanks. >> I definitely don't think we need subsecond granularity in the user >> facing number. Even a second is pretty short. > > Yep. > >> (We do need to retain the ability to set it to 0 = off of course). > > Yep, a value of zero disables the status updates, and the patch adds > that explanation into the document of pg_basebackup and pg_receivexlog. Applied, with some small modifications. For example, you don't need a frontend-specific copy of #define's that are in the backend, since those don't require linking to the backend, just the #include. -- Magnus Hagander Me: http://www.hagander.net/ Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/ -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
