Andrew Dunstan <and...@dunslane.net> writes: > On 09/09/2012 02:05 PM, Tom Lane wrote: >> And the answer is ... it's a gmake bug.
> Thanks for pursuing this. Whether or not it masks the underlying > problem, it's still something we should do, no? In fact, it seems to me > like this makes it even less worth trying to do anything better. Yeah, exactly. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers